Why Do Bad Things Happen to Good Agricultural Workers?
Published September 30, 2009 @ 02:00PM PT
In the U.S., we protect people in a lot of occupations from employers' abuse: teachers, administrative assistants, autoworkers, plumbers, etc. We have laws that guarantee basic rights and fair wages, and we have unions that help ensure those laws are followed. But for some reason, agricultural workers are left out of most of these protections. So why do we let bad things happen to good agricultural workers?
Trafficking and exploitation are rampant in the agriculture industry in the U.S., in part because of the lack of legal protections. Carolina Fojo, a fellow for the Bon Apetite Management company has her own take on this question, but I've come up with a few theories as well.
1. People don't care about immigrants. I know it's blunt, but good old fashion racism and xenophobia are huge reasons we don't have better protections for agricultural workers. The Center for Immigration studies found that 50 - 54% of agricultural workers in the U.S. are immigrants. Perhaps we don't protect agricultural workers against slavery because we dismiss them as immigrants not deserving of U.S. protection.
2. It's hard. Unlike factories which stay in one place, some agricultural operations move around -- from field to field or orchard to orchard. Others take place only at certain times of the year. Workers also migrate -- the same men picking strawberries in California in June may be picking apples in Oregon in October. Because agriculture can be more transitory and temporary in nature, enforcing worker protections requires a different approach than other more stationary industries. And thinking outside the box is hard, especially for the government.
3. It's expensive. A lot of agricultural workers handle dangerous things, like chemical pesticides, sharp knives, and complicated equipment. Proper protection for workers would involve paying for health care both for immediate workplace injuries and long-term medical conditions related to the job, like carpal-tunnel syndrome and chemical-caused cancer. All that medical care really adds up, and it's cheaper just to let workers go without it.
4. We're afraid of them. We're afraid of agricultural workers for the same reason slave-owners were afraid of their slaves in the 19th century: what happens if they turn on us and demand justice? If we give legal protections to agricultural workers, they could start forming unions. And once they do that, they could strike to get better wages and working conditions. And then what would we eat? But if we deny them legal protections, they have to keep working for pennies-to-nothing, and we can keep eating our cheap food.
Perhaps you can accuse me of being cynical and cite some better, more legally sound reasons that we don't extend a lot of legal protections to agricultural workers in this country. Perhaps there are other justifications, but the reasons above sure come into play. The truth is that bad things are happening to good agricultural workers every day in the U.S. -- bad things like slavery, exploitation, rape, and debilitating sickness. So why are we really letting these things happen?
Photo credit: noborder network
Share this Post
Comments (5)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















Actually, I think its just No. 1, No. 1, and No. 1. Millions of people use the noun "Illegal," as in "They're just a bunch of illegals." Can you imagine Jesus calling someone an illegal? So if you're a Christian, you shouldn't either.
Posted by Slim Chance on 10/01/2009 @ 04:48PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Illegal is what they are, so it's a perfect description. Christians shouldn't bear false witness.
The solution is so simple. Each farmer with an illegal worker is also violating the law. The farmer will be deported with the illegal workers, his land siezed and sold at auction to help pay for our free healthcare.
Posted by Chuck Reynolds on 10/03/2009 @ 11:51AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Unfortunately, I understand Kloer's point of view. We cannot afford to go after the Agriculturalists, its quite the Catch-22.
By going after these companies, we could trigger a widespread slowdown in production. This is because of three reasons:
1. a 10% drop in labor force, since INS would be forced to mandate a mass deportation
2. The legal ramifications of convicting these companies could lead to their shutdown, which we cannot afford
3. Prices would go up, demand would go up and the lack of labor would cause a need for greater imports which are already reaching all-time highs.
Posted by William Merlo on 10/05/2009 @ 08:16PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
The problem is that we pay people to not work. If everyone on Unemployment insurance had to spend twenty hours per week in the fields, and everyone on welfare had to spend forty, then these jobs would dry up and the illegals would go home.
The cost consumers pay at the supermarket would not go up.
I know, some people would object to having an American with a crack problem pick their veggies, when it can be done with an illegal alien with a good work ethic, but they have their opinions and I have mine.
Posted by Chuck Reynolds on 10/03/2009 @ 11:57AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm against human trafficking but why should we let the traffickees remain in the U.S.? That doesn't make a lot of sense does it?
Isn't that their purpose to begin with?
I talked to a Boston, Mass Police Detective years ago and she told me that the Russian Mafia was running a very lucerative oeration there.
They'd smuggle in women from Eastern Europe and Russia at $25k per head and ut them in an apartment nd coach them about what to say, put condoms and other sexual items in the place.
She said they always got "the anonymous phone call, no one was complaining in the neighborhood etc and they could never catch the traffickers. There's a surprise!
She said they were probably "halfway to Russia for another batch." She said that there's a lot of money over there, more than people realise and no shortage of people who will pay to be smuggled into the U.S. "If they have to pretend to be prostitutes to take advantage of the system they couldn't care less."
So it doesn't take criminal groups especially the Russian Mafia long to figure out the loopholes in such foolish legislation!
Why should we be faciliating their "business venture" by giving them what they want?
As a Citizen I certainly don't want those people in my country!
Who comes up with stuff like this? It has to be $lawyers who figure they'll benefit from it.
The country certainly doesn't benefit from it.
Posted by Thomas Porter on 10/04/2009 @ 10:25PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.