How The Cult of Purity Is Killing Girls
Published June 10, 2009 @ 07:00AM PT
I was a sophomore at a Catholic high school the year that Brittany Spears released "Hit Me Baby One More Time" and danced her sexed-up school girl uniform all over MTV. In the following weeks, my friends and I were barraged with cat calls and comments whenever we wore our plaid kilts in public. We had no idea why this outfit we found so frumpy and unattractive (and ignored by the boys at school) would suddenly catch the notice of men twice our ages. So I asked a teacher, who simply replied, "It's because you're pure."
Why are we so obsessed with purity and virginity for women? Natalie Dylan, the woman who auctioned off her hymen on EBay, the Jonas Brothers' purity rings (and subsequent South Park spoof), and our old friend Brittany are all selling the same idea: purity. And people are buying it in salivating, pulsating droves. On the surface, a cultural focus on purity may seem a non-issue; if the Jonas Bothers don't want to have sex before marriage, who cares except a handful of precocious and disappointed teen girls?
But for many girls, purity and cultural obsession with it is a death sentence. In rural parts of Africa and Southeast Asia, some still believe that sex with a virgin child can cure HIV/AIDS. This practice leads to at least 3600 young girls a year in Zimbabwe alone contracting the disease via rape. Men without HIV/AIDS will also pay handsomely to deflower a girl, making girls with perceived or actual purity a main target for traffickers. Some girls have been trafficked and sold as virgins again and again, as long as they look young enough. Even here in the U.S., we often blame rape victims and try to find a reason their behavior or appearance "enticed" a rape.
Is our obsession with purity and virginity ultimately killing our girls? Were virginity not such a choice commodity, would the thousands of young women trafficked into prostitution and commercial sex each year be spared? Or if sexual experience were valued in women the way it is in men, would the world's brothels be filled with Bea Arthur type grandmothers? And perhaps the most important question at all- How have we gotten to the point where it is acceptable for men to seek out sex with a virgin child?
I survived Brittany Spears turning an ugly polyester outfit I was forced to wear everyday into a sex symbol. But so many girls do not survive what the cult of purity forces on them: rape, disease, pain, slavery, and despair. When will this obsession end and set them free?
Share this Post
Related Posts
-
10 Human Trafficking Films to Watch
-
Atlanta Proposes Decriminalizing Prostitution for Teens
-
"It's The Oldest Profession" and Other Bullshit Excuses for Inaction
Comments (33)
Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the ideas covered in the posts. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; that contain ad hominem attacks; or that are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion.
Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Delicious
Email



















The disgusting irony is in the purity diatribe juxtaposed onto a social world tapestry where human trafficking is unending and where even in our own country the world's most prolific purveryors of porn are supported and profit from the degradation and rape of women, children, and men. This purity lie of course continues rampant in the "church" dogma, where every time I am forced to hear and feel and learn and commit to my very being that a woman's value is nothing if she is not pure makes me want to take to the streets to protest and protect and stand up strong for the victims, right after I throw up in the pews. No matter what any church says, Mary was and is important not because she was supposedly a virgin, but because she is Jesus' mother. She, as well as Buddha's mother, and all the other goddesses through the ages, is the mother of us all. Who will raise their voices and join Amanda and me in the fight for the freedom of the women, girls, men, boys, who are, often under the guise of purity, the victims of rape, disease, pain, slavery, and despair?
Posted by Evie Romero Montoya on 06/10/2009 @ 07:57AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
wow. who's to say they wouldn't be attacked in some way even if they weren't virgins?
isn't the rising teen pregnancy issue a problem? there are so many arguments for being careful.
even if we forced every child to have sex at age ten, perverts would still traffic kids. it's their fault, not any virgin's.
Posted by A W on 06/21/2009 @ 04:10PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
They are not saying virginity is an issue. In that article she says, "On the surface, a cultural focus on purity may seem a non-issue; if the Jonas Bothers don't want to have sex before marriage, who cares except a handful of precocious and disappointed teen girls?"
The issue is the obsession various societies have with virginity.
Posted by Moriah Stevenson on 10/20/2009 @ 05:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We're obviously evolved to have sex at 14 or 15. Let's give our kids some education and let them go at it.
Posted by Brian Wood on 06/10/2009 @ 09:06AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
When I was four, in the late 1960s, a friend of my teenage uncle told my mom to put me on the pill as soon as I turned 16. Naturally, I grew up to be a total prude. What else could I do under that kind of pressure?
Different people are ready to have sex whenever they're ready. There's no one age. Tell kids that sex comes from inside and let them decide for themselves what they're ready for and when.
Of course, selling virgins to idiots as a cure for AIDS, then stitching them up and reselling them as virgins again, as many times as you can get away with it, has nothing to do with the sexuality of the person being sold. It's more like killing rhinos and selling their horns (symbols of lunar purity) on the black market. I think it makes as much sense as the religious belief that a newborn child can save the world when all the adults currently running it have no clue. Symbolic of something, maybe (a fresh start?), but not something to ever be taken literally.
Posted by Anemone Cerridwen on 06/10/2009 @ 06:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
we may be physically evolved to have sex at this age, but I would strongly argue that 100% of the 'children' of this age that I know are completely, emotionally, unable to cope. Not only with the emotions they feel about themselves and their partner(s), but with the consequences of such actions - STD's, pregnancy, self-image
Responsible adults want to protect their children, in fact all children........
john stack
johnstack@svetna.com
http://www.svetna.com
Posted by john stack on 06/16/2009 @ 09:33AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree that kids need education about sex, but let's include it in the bigger picture that the place not to focus one's constant attention is in the groin. And somewhere in all that mess, let us focus instead on honor and respect for human sexuality and how it is meant to be...Disgusting that you think encouraging kids to "go at it" is what we should do. For this is what America certainly does and usually there is an economic profit factor.
Posted by Evie Romero Montoya on 06/10/2009 @ 09:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Well said Evie. Honor and respect seem to be almost obsolete these days, in sexuality and many other aspects of life. I wont even address Brian's comment. You did a good job of rebuttal.
Posted by Dennis G. on 06/10/2009 @ 11:19AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Interesting article, however, unless I am missing something, the last time I viewed the Brittney Spears video, she was not promoting purity, nor advocating virginity. Also, in my research and understanding of human trafficking, again, unless I am missing something, human trafficking is not just the kidnapping of the female population who are virgins, but is the kidnapping and victimizing of girls, boys, young women and men for the sole purpose of feeding the sexual s of men and women, regardless of their victim's purity or lack thereof. Please continue to research with more accuracy and validity of the subject---it is important that we get facts and truth out to the world in order to put an end to the madness!
Posted by D'ana Ali on 06/10/2009 @ 01:14PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Brittney may not have explicitly said that she was promoting those things but she was implicitly representing these things. She is in a school girl uniform that is understood in our society to stand for a private school usually affiliated with predominately christian religions so the good girl (virgin) yet is using sexual language, posing sexually and also her shirt is tied up in away to be more revealing. So implicitly she is representing and reinforcing this double bind on girls. Another good example would be Jessica Simpson who claimed virginity until marriage and yet during that same time was posing half naked and portraying herself as very sexual. You should be sexually pure however you should be sexy, alluring and sexual. This double bind is troubling and causes problems in our society which are not unfelt in the sex industry. It's all connected. Meaning that the way people think is affected by these videos and therefore the way they act and what they buy into. So this is what people look for a "good girl" who is sexual but not a slut. A girl can't be both. So why not buy one.
Posted by Ashley Chapman on 06/11/2009 @ 12:22PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thank you, Dennis, for standing with me! Who among you out there will join us to weave into our communities and our nations, dignity and honor and respect?
Posted by Evie Romero Montoya on 06/10/2009 @ 01:31PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Evie,
I'm with you
dignity, honor and respect begin with oneself and by our own actions can we demonstrate and motivate others (especially younger people) by leading from the front.
Perhaps we should be a little suspicious of Mr. Woods feelings about himself?
john Stack
johnstack@svetna.com
http://www.svetna.com
Posted by john stack on 06/16/2009 @ 09:41AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Brian-
Children are not mature enough to make those sorts of decisions. That's what "waiting" for sex is about, or should be- not purity but rather not rushing into something that can change their entire lives. You're only a child once.
OT: I think the practice of selling human beings for any reason is disgusting, but it's especially sad when someone is robbed of their childhood. :(
Posted by g x on 06/10/2009 @ 02:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I think a nice happy medium when it comes to teenage sexuality would be non-penetrative sex. But I don't know how interested in that they'd be...
Posted by Moriah Stevenson on 10/20/2009 @ 05:32PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A quote from Arcadia on a blog about fake abortion clinics, "Can you see that the abortion debate is taking place ONLY because we, as a society, have all collectively said "It's O.K." to weigh in on women's sexual activity? We rarely say anything so extreme as "Men should not have sex," it's only women's sexuality that we feel so comfortable armchair quarterbacking."
Whether a woman is "pure" or not falls along with the "...weigh[ing] in on a woman's sexual activity..." and that is the first of equalities or equal (should be rights) broken.
Posted by Margaret Free on 06/10/2009 @ 05:48PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Actually Margaret, there is plenty of "armchair quarterbacking" when it comes to men's sexuality. It just falls in the opposite direction. If a guy doesn't have multiple partners by the time he finishes college, there must be something wrong with him. If he doesn't sleep with a woman he's been seeing for more than a month, again there is something wrong. Sexuality should be handled with maturity and respect. This is what people seem to have a problem with.
Posted by Dennis G. on 06/11/2009 @ 09:30AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I agree, Dennis. I grew up in an unusual way, and as a teen I typically dated someone years older than me, often pushing the line of what is acceptable. I had one boyfriend that I dated for a few years--with my parents' knowledge and acceptance--who was seven years older than me. When my parents found that out, they asked me "Why not?!" like something was wrong with the guy for not demanding sex in exchange for dinners/movies/etc. Our mutual friends still act shocked when they find out that we were not sleeping together despite the outrageous age difference. The reaction is usually very negative towards my ex, even though in my opinion it shows more about his character. Ironic, isn't it?
Posted by Mica Varga on 06/11/2009 @ 09:54PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Dennis, what a farce. Although it does happen to men in their peer groups, most women appreciate a man with those qualities. Plus I also think this is part of the example of the inequality and victimization of women!!!!!! Men are supposed to treat them like meat and are peer pressured to do so and you think somehow that is the same thing as having your detailed sexual business exploited and talked about by anyone and everyone at any moment??? Or the same thing as being harassed on the street whether for virgin or promiscuous looks? All your demonstrating is that people that don't fall into average dis-functions get teased. You're demonstrating that if your part of the solution you are not part of the problem. The same teasing goes on if your an environmentalist or an artist. I am commending you, also i am saying that you are not giving attention to the inequality, especially since indeed we and YOU are currently in the middle of weighing in on a woman's sexuality. Exactly my point, because you are not mentioning men's sexuality as a topic for discussion, merely calling it out to say that women are not being victimized anymore than the sweet men in this world. That may be true, lets start a "nice men finish last" support group.
Mica, so people are shocked, we are all shocked when people break the mold. I am shocked if i see someone in a hydrogen powered car. Every now and then i get shocked when my own spouse remembers anniversary dates. It is not that same thing as being intrusive on a woman's privacy of sexuality. It is not the same thing as being obsessed with a young woman's virginity or for that matter, her right to do what she deems necessary in pregnancy!!! Pleasant shocks that people are impressed with and are out of typical alpha male behavior are not the same thing!!!
What would be the same thing for this victimization of tender males is if a woman had only one or two partners by age thirty or still a virgin. We would all find that slightly out of the norm and may be odd enough to inquire about, or even tease.
What is actually the same thing as this topic is if older women regularly gawked, stalked, hooted, hollered and solicited sex from males who appeared to be virgins. Or if we were obsessed with finding a sweet sensitive and considerate man, and then abusing, seducing and manipulating them. (and it does happen, still is not considered the average behavior for females)
And looking at the comment below by David Lee Daniel Jr., yes it is confusing. Here again, the difference is that it is a sickness that older men want a young girl who has been untouched or hardly touched so they can take what she has; it is rarely about giving her something special. With young men, there are still enough sickos that want your first experience to be there experience. However, once a male is not a virgin or no longer "pure" it doesn't hold the same shame or sin, it is like it is ok and acceptable, even expected; where as women are questioned and everyone wants to know how, why, what, who and it is -*not celebrated*- **unless** the answers to those questions fit in with a specific picture we perceive of how we "weigh in" on what her experience was!!!! Often a woman is made to feel shame whereas her male counterpart was acting accordingly.
Posted by Margaret Free on 06/11/2009 @ 11:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Margaret, I just reread Dennis' post to be sure that I remembered it correctly. Your remarks to Dennis are based upon a misrepresentation of Dennis' comment. Dennis does not say "Well, don't forget about the men, because we are in such a terrible situation just as bad (if not worse) than women." You posted the part about "it's only women's sexuality that we feel so comfortable armchair quarterbacking." Dennis and I responded that a generalization like that is not fair, it isn't like men are completely given the right to act however they want (sexually) with no commentary upon them. While most definitely womens' rights are brutally violated across the globe and women are placed in a much more negative trap when it comes to their purity/sexuality, we wanted to point out that as with most general claims using the word "all" that there are also situations where men are given unfair societal expectations regarding their sexuality and purity (or lack thereof.) We wanted to ensure that you do not make the mistake of overly generalizing a situation.
Further, my comments were not to show our friends' pleased shock, rather to show how negative they treated my ex. Like what was wrong with him...does he have any masculinity...etc. Not people responding as he is such an upstanding gentleman but what is wrong with that man's head? You furiously assert "it is not the same thing" (Pardon me, I can't seem to find where in my comments I EVER dared to claim that men are in an equally extreme situation. I state that there is a negative treatment/view/expectations placed upon men as well, but this is a minority. What country has a booming male trafficking industry for sex? I never intended to imply that men are in the exact same or worse situation, rather that your gereralized comments attempt to make this debate very black and white--men have it easy, women have it horrific--while in fact there are shade of grey.
I agree that our society's perception of women, especially "pure" women needs to be altered. The article that is linked to regarding Nepali girls being sold/tricked...I volunteer with refugees, and many of the people I volunteer with are Nepali. I agree that the whole "purity" thing isn't fair. The negative views of women as a sex object forces many men into uncomfortable situations. I am speaking specifically about American society. The objectification of women is such an ingrained part of our society that all men are supposed to objectify women--they are expected to be on a constant hunt to bed as many women as possible.
You can boil my remarks down to one idea:
The views of women as sexual objects further extends upon men--men who don't search teen porn of women in pig tails with school girl skirts are broken/odd. Men who don't try to objectify women at every turn are abnormal. The overall issue affects both women AND men.
Posted by Mica Varga on 06/12/2009 @ 09:59AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Margaret, first of all, I agree that any man who covets a young girl because of her virginity is sick. I find this appauling to say the least.
Second, you did misrepresent what I said above. All I was trying to point out was that we, as a society, should treat sexuality with more respect. While I do not downplay the problems women face, let's not disregard the fact that there are plenty of social stigmas applied to men's sexuality also. These stigmas are placed by society as a whole.
I could continue, but Mica did an excellent job above. Thanks for fully comprehending my comment and not putting words in my mouth.
Posted by Dennis G. on 06/12/2009 @ 10:22AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Mica, I'm sorry you feel that way. Please let me the the first woman in line to say that I respect men who don't objectify women, and I hope we can normalize that respect.
Posted by Amanda Kloer on 06/12/2009 @ 12:25PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Ok, well your right, there are stigmas on males as well. I know that. I would have perceived your statement differently if it had not been a direct reply to my comment and if you had made it in its own right. You did reply to mine which sort of downplayed what i was thinking as i was reading the blog, which was simply that society thinks about a woman's vigina too much! As for men that don't objectify women, they are the only ones i will give the time of day to. It seems as though we are on the verge of turning this into a discussion about human sexuality. Respect for women is normal just as ojectiifying is these days. And women have come a long way in this country. It all boils down to women's equality and when women are equal, men will not be expected to be users, at least not anymore or less then women are.
Posted by Margaret Free on 06/12/2009 @ 01:41PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I was very confused about viginity & still am women's virginity matters but mine some how is suppose 2 be lost as soon as possible after I get around 15 yrs. old . . . . LOL. All of this is not very good.
Posted by David Lee Daniel Jr. on 06/10/2009 @ 09:26PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A great book on this issue is the "Purity Myth", really a great book!
Posted by Ashley Chapman on 06/11/2009 @ 12:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
It's Britney, guys. B-R-I-T-N-E-Y. lolz
I agree that the whole purity thing is a crock...I was raised in a religious household, and my mother told me I wasn't pure anymore after she found out that I was using tampons.
It could be worse. We could be forced to have clitoridectomies like the poor girls in third world countries.
This is supposed to be a developed and civilized country, though, so we wage war against female sexuality here through ideas and ideals, rather than slicing off genitalia physically.
Posted by Tab Worth on 06/11/2009 @ 06:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Instead of nitpicking each other with what is wrong with todays societies, views, ethics, and morals; what are we doing in our everyday lives to help stop it? What have we changed about ourselves? About our daily lives? It doesn't make a whole lot of sense to talk about the problems without coming up with solutions to solve them. What do we teach our sons and daughters about sex, sexuality, peer pressure, or being their own person? When do we quit seeing the negative and start looking for the positive? Instead of criticizing people for their mistakes, look at it as a great way to teach those around you. Sex is not wrong and we cannot control every person we come across that doesn't see things the way we do. Why not learn from it, build our own confidence, our own self esteem, and become the brave person we need to be. Being brave signifies nothing if what you are standing for does not take place in the home.
Posted by Michelle Hankinson on 06/12/2009 @ 05:40PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Good article.
And I agree with one of the comment : We were evolved to have sex at 14 or 15. Human used to live only up to 30 years of age, and therefore had to conceive very early in their lives.
Posted by Natasha Van Khouvers on 06/15/2009 @ 10:20PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Yes, the body is developed (usually) at that point. The only problem is the mental strength and maturity generally is not.
Don't get me wrong. I think teens should honor and celebrate their sexuality in healthy ways--if the are mature enough.
Posted by Moriah Stevenson on 10/20/2009 @ 05:39PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
We need to focus on Harm Reduction! You are ignoring reality if you think telling kids not to have sex will work.
Posted by Tara Hurley on 06/16/2009 @ 01:02PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm confused. What does your comment have to do with sexuality being a selling point for enslaved/abused girls?
Posted by g x on 06/18/2009 @ 01:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I would like to strongly object this statement. There is no cult of purity that is killing any girls. One can have 'n' number of believes about purity or chastity that one can harbor but at the end of the day... it's what you do that defines you. One can very well believe that having s*xual relation with a virgin can cure AIDs, but the same person would rape or kill someone only if he feels that he can get away with it. This generally happens through the political connections or connections to royal families, or connections to law enforcement system.The things should change from roots. Blaming a single criminal targetting a particular country can not lead to any solution.
I am sure there are people who enjoy having s*x with virgins who don't believe in any such purity/chastity. It is purely because there are no penalties of wrongdoings or the person knows to get a way with the criminal charges.
Posted by Mary Go on 06/19/2009 @ 01:51PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Also another solution that would definitely work but is extremely difficult to implement is - a complete social reform. When every single human being would start respecting every other human being whether it is a male or a female or a child; when every religion would respect woman of other religion and treat them like their own mothers/sisters, when every grownup treats others' children as their own. Sounds a bit philosophical, easy to evangelize but difficult to put into practice.
Posted by Mary Go on 06/19/2009 @ 02:12PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
A dramatic but true story of my friend:
Power and money rules, whichever party, whichever country. Powerful people know to twist the arms of the people to get their work done- holds good for federal illegal wiretapping to incorporating spying devices at your place, cars, cards or in the neighborhood areas where you stay. You never know who wants to drag you to the black world of prostitution.
This is in year 2008. I had a friend of mine who was a student in US, who was victimized in a much horrible fashion. Leave aside illegal wiretap via wireless carrier; there were cameras at her place hidden in the lights in the living room, bathroom, in the bedroom. Not just that her conversations were being heard, but that her all moves were recorded by camera. Then these pictures were taken, modified by computer generated tools, and a mix of real and fake pictures (her face and someone else's nude body etc) were placed on display on a social networking sites, after making a fake profile with her name, pretending as though she is voluntarily displaying her naked pictures. There was also an advertisement placed for ‘Girl friend Experience' under her profile. We heard so many stories floating around about her, none of them true and were apparently meant just to defame her. This friend of mine is not just well qualified from best schools but she is a wonderful person with great heart and far away from the world of prostitution. Apparently, someone was trying to woo her in that world without her permission. She is not just facing humiliation for what she has NOT done but also being violated in a extremely degrading manner.
Worst thing she tried to speak about it just to her friends, very coincidently she was going to get hit by a black SUV - Mercedes, and she had a very narrow escape.
Tell me now, which purity is killing whom? Is it a crime to stay pure or believe in purity?
Posted by Mary Go on 06/19/2009 @ 04:24PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.